Recent Posts

Pages: [1]
Natural News) Ever wonder why governments allow so much deadly pollution to be dumped into food, water and soils? Part of the real reason may surprise you: Governments no longer want people to live long enough to collect entitlement benefits, and allowing the contamination of everything with death-inducing substances actually saves governments money by accelerating the death of citizens.

This is all covered in my video, below. Here’s a brief introduction:

Three generations ago, governments wanted more people to run the factories, settle rural lands and generate economic productivity that could be siphoned off by the political elite. Over time, continued promises of entitlements such as social security, Medicare, pensions and welfare payouts caused large populations to become financial burdens to the sustainability of those same governments. As a result, governments now want to kill off their own citizens in order to prevent their own financial collapse by drastically reducing entitlement payouts.

In other words, populations of entitlement beneficiaries have become such an enormous threat to the fiscal sustainability of governments that many governments simply cannot remain financially viable if the “entitlement class” of non-producers continues to expand. The situation has become so dire that many governments are now actively seeking to initiate early deaths off their own citizens before those same citizens can collect pensions, social security and other “entitlement” benefits.

How, exactly, do governments contribute to the early deaths of their own citizens? It’s simple: poison them through “allowed pollution” of the water supply, food supply, health care interventions (such as infertility-laced vaccines) and electromagnetic radiation vectors (5G, Smart Meters, etc.). This systematic poisoning results in early deaths that just happen to coincide with substantial financial savings among government entities that cease such payments upon death.

Death-inducing pollution, in other words, has become the government’s best friend in terms of saving money and staving off a financial collapse.

In essence, governments only want you to live while you’re paying taxes, but the day you become a net consumer of government benefits, they would much rather you just die. In fact, they might just help it along through a variety of vectors that deliberately expose the population to death-inducing chemicals, ionizing radiation and malnutrition leading to early death.

Think about that....
California Democrats are reportedly pushing to give full healthcare benefits to illegal immigrant adults, which would mean that the Golden State not only may have to raise taxes but will also be a magnet for even more illegal immigrants.
According to a Monday Politico report, state Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) is leading the charge by reportedly arguing that “California needs to be a laboratory for social change by taking the lead on progressive causes.”

“We are trying to address the fact that, whether you like it or not, our undocumented community needs the care, and we are paying for it anyway,” he reportedly said.

Politico points out that California Democrats are trying to extend the state’s Medi-Cal program this legislative session to nearly 1.2 million illegal immigrant adults who would qualify for it, and “companion bills in the state Assembly and Senate” have already “passed their respective health committees with party-line votes.”

The cost to expand Medicaid coverage to adult illegal immigrants in California is reportedly projected to cost $3 billion annually.

California Governor Jerry Brown, who extended Medi-Cal coverage to illegal immigrant children in 2015, has not commented on the pending measures but “is required by law to sign or veto bills passed this session by Sept. 30, just five weeks before the midterm elections.”


Now why do you think California would do this?
Current Discussion Issues - National / Trump and the Justice Department
« Last post by Dreamer on May 22, 2018, 11:36:53 AM »
Lawmakers will soon be able to look at highly classified information related to the Russia investigation after officials from the Justice Department, the FBI and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence met at the White House and agreed to let members of Congress review it. This all comes as the controversy over the FBI's use of a confidential source during the 2016 campaign grows. President Trump said the source was essentially a spy "embedded" in his campaign, but US officials told CNN that's not true. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein ordered the Justice Department's inspector general to look into the matter.

This deal doesn't fully settle the issue of whether Justice will ultimately have to hand over documents related to the FBI source, which have been subpoenaed by the House Intelligence Committee. The Justice Department says sharing info on the source threatens national security, but committee Chairman Devin Nunes has threatened to hold Attorney General Jeff Sessions in contempt if his panel doesn't get them.
This is a modal window.Something went wrong during native playback.

International Issues / Bombers in the South China Sea
« Last post by bobdabull on May 20, 2018, 09:03:48 AM »
China landed a heavy bomber in the Paracels, its latest military buildup as the world focuses on North Korea

China’s first-ever landing of a heavy bomber on a disputed island in the South China Sea punctuates a steady buildup of military assets that has solidified Beijing’s claims to one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

On Friday, China’s air force disclosed it had landed an H-6K bomber on an island in the area, which would “help improve actual combat capabilities in responding to various security threats at sea.”

Education Issues - National / Re: Teachers versus students
« Last post by BeachBoy on May 04, 2018, 01:53:19 PM »
I think there is no question, our educational system stinks!

Give control of the kid's share of the educational dollar to the kids and their parents and let them decide where to send the kid to school.  Why should the educational system decide?

That should break up the teachers' unions and they are evil!
Environmental Issues - National / Re: Man made global warming
« Last post by BeachBoy on May 04, 2018, 11:56:11 AM »
Earth has a way of dealing with toxins in the air.  If it didn't we couldn't live here.  Earth has been dealing with these toxins for millions of years. Same global warming, better all around than global cooling.   :)
Education Issues - National / Teachers versus students
« Last post by CommonSense on February 18, 2018, 08:52:26 AM »
This is a subject that has many opinions.

Should we provide more money to the educational system?  Less?  Or is it just right?

Should students and parents have choice in how to spend their child's share of the educational dollar?

Or is government doing a good job?

Your thoughts?
Environmental Issues - National / Man made global warming
« Last post by CommonSense on February 18, 2018, 08:42:57 AM »
OK.  No question that mankind leaves a footprint.  The question is, how much.

Is it like Al Gore would like you to believe?

Or no effect?

It's got to be somewhere in between.

What is your belief?
Economy Issues - National / How long will this economy last?
« Last post by CommonSense on February 18, 2018, 08:18:26 AM »
Obama choked the economy for 8 years with over-regulation by the government.

Trump has and is freeing the economy to run naturally.

Which do you prefer and why?
National Elections 2018! / These elections are important!
« Last post by CommonSense on February 18, 2018, 08:05:36 AM »
They are important to the Democrats in order to have a greater voice to block the efforts of the Republicans and POTUS.

They are important to the Republicans to thwart the efforts of the Dems.

Who do you support? Why?

Make the case!
Pages: [1]